Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
11
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Lyon Solar, Mitsubishi in 1000MW solar battery plunge[2016/09/30]
-
Bastrop deputies seeking vehicle after woman’s killing[2016/11/05]
-
Video Microscopy Technique Reveals How Battery-Killing Dendrites Grow[2016/10/21]
-
How can a battery catch fire?[2016/10/15]
-
BLOG For want of a better battery: Bob McDonald[2016/10/15]
-
Warming to lithium-ion, Toyota charges up its battery options[2016/10/31]
-
iPhone 7 battery charging is so much slower than rivals (but at least it won’t explode)[2016/10/13]
-
Should you fear your phone battery?[2016/10/13]
-
Microsoft remains silent as Surface Pro 3 battery woes pile up[2016/10/08]
-
A window into battery life for next-gen lithium cells[2016/10/19]
-
Japanese battery maker TDK reels from Samsung Note 7 debacle[2016/10/12]
-
Henrik Fisker is using a revolutionary new battery to power his Tesla killer[2016/10/17]
-
St. Jude Warns Defibrillator Patients About Battery Risks[2016/10/12]